| Metric | Fomo Social Proof | A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.3 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 346 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 28 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Fomo Social Proof's 1.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Fomo Social Proof at Paid, A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell has the larger user base (346 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Fomo Social Proof's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fomo Social Proof's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fomo Social Proof audit • A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell audit
| — |
| Keyword | Fomo Social Proof | A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell |
|---|---|---|
| pop up | Not ranked | #4 |
| age check popup | Not ranked | #4 |
| verification popup | Not ranked | #4 |
| notifications | #15 | Not ranked |
| your social | #23 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both Fomo Social Proof and A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell offer paid plans only. Fomo Social Proof starts at Paid; A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 346 reviews) compared to Fomo Social Proof (1.3★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 1.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell has the deeper published review base (346 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fomo Social Proof typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (346 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fomo Social Proof and A/B Testing, Popups & Upsell both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Fomo Social Proof" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.