Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Flip Books | PDF Viewer Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Flip Books | PDF Viewer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.6 ★ | ★ 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 96 | ★ 257 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 14 supported |
Based on the data on this page, PDF Viewer Pro is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 3.9★ vs Flip Books's 2.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Flip Books at Free plan available, PDF Viewer Pro at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PDF Viewer Pro has the larger user base (257 reviews vs 96), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Flip Books's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PDF Viewer Pro; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Flip Books's 96-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PDF Viewer Pro's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Flip Books audit • PDF Viewer Pro audit
| — |
| Keyword | Flip Books | PDF Viewer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| print on | #33 | #26 |
Both Flip Books and PDF Viewer Pro offer paid plans only. Flip Books starts at Free plan available; PDF Viewer Pro starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PDF Viewer Pro has the higher average rating (3.9★ from 257 reviews) compared to Flip Books (2.6★ from 96 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Flip Books fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; PDF Viewer Pro is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. PDF Viewer Pro has more onboarding documentation maturity (257 reviews vs 96), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Flip Books typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (96 reviews). PDF Viewer Pro aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (257 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Flip Books and PDF Viewer Pro both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flip Books" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
