Loading content…
Fera Reviews vs Pay Button
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Fera Reviews | Pay Button | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Fera Reviews | Pay Button | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Fera Reviews | Pay Button |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 4k | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Fera Reviews is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.8★ vs Pay Button's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Fera Reviews offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Pay Button starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Fera Reviews has the larger user base (4,036 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Pay Button's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Fera Reviews; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pay Button's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Fera Reviews's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fera Reviews audit • Pay Button audit
| Keyword | Fera Reviews | Pay Button |
|---|---|---|
| payments directly | #48 | #48 |
No tracked changes.
Fera Reviews is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Pay Button starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Fera Reviews holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Fera Reviews has the deeper published review base (4,036 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fera Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,036 reviews). Pay Button typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fera Reviews and Pay Button both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pay Button" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.