| Metric | Fera Reviews | Google Reviews Widget |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4k | 127 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 1 supported |
Fera Reviews and Google Reviews Widget are evenly matched on rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Fera Reviews offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Google Reviews Widget starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Fera Reviews has the larger user base (4,036 reviews vs 127), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google Reviews Widget's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fera Reviews audit • Google Reviews Widget audit
| — |
| Keyword | Fera Reviews | Google Reviews Widget |
|---|---|---|
| reviews testimonials | #3 | #10 |
| testimonials | #3 | #11 |
| show google reviews | #3 | #11 |
| display google reviews | #3 | #11 |
| import existing reviews | #3 | #12 |
Fera Reviews is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Google Reviews Widget starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Fera Reviews (4.8★, 4,036 reviews) and Google Reviews Widget (4.7★, 127 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Fera Reviews holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Fera Reviews has the deeper published review base (4,036 vs 127), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fera Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,036 reviews). Google Reviews Widget typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (127 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fera Reviews and Google Reviews Widget both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Reviews Widget" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.