Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Fera Reviews | InviteReferrals | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Fera Reviews | InviteReferrals |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4k | 4 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Fera Reviews is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.8★ vs InviteReferrals's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Fera Reviews offers a free tier (Free plan available) while InviteReferrals starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Fera Reviews has the larger user base (4,014 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. InviteReferrals's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Fera Reviews; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — InviteReferrals's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Fera Reviews's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fera Reviews audit • InviteReferrals audit
| Keyword | Fera Reviews | InviteReferrals |
|---|---|---|
| loyalty | #29 | #8 |
| loyalty program | #38 | #15 |
No tracked changes.
Fera Reviews is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). InviteReferrals starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Fera Reviews has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 4,014 reviews) compared to InviteReferrals (3.0★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Fera Reviews fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; InviteReferrals is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Fera Reviews has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,014 reviews vs 4), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Fera Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,014 reviews). InviteReferrals aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fera Reviews and InviteReferrals both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from InviteReferrals" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
