| Metric | Fera Reviews | Google Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4k | 3.5k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 4 | 3 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 1 supported |
Fera Reviews and Google Reviews are evenly matched on rating (4.8★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Fera Reviews at Free plan available, Google Reviews at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Fera Reviews has the larger user base (4,038 reviews vs 3,514), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google Reviews's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fera Reviews audit • Google Reviews audit
| — |
| Keyword | Fera Reviews | Google Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| review | #2 | #1 |
| directly | #2 | #1 |
| reviews | #2 | #1 |
| display google reviews | #3 | #2 |
| import existing reviews | #3 | #2 |
Both Fera Reviews and Google Reviews offer paid plans only. Fera Reviews starts at Free plan available; Google Reviews starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Fera Reviews (4.8★, 4,038 reviews) and Google Reviews (4.8★, 3,514 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.8★. Fera Reviews does carry the larger published review base (4,038 vs 3,514). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Fera Reviews has the deeper published review base (4,038 vs 3,514), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fera Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,038 reviews). Google Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,514 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fera Reviews and Google Reviews both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Reviews" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.