Facebook Pages Feed vs Social Media Icons

Facebook Pages Feed edges out Social Media Icons on rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Facebook Pages Feed at Free plan available, Social Media Icons at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Social Media Icons has the larger user base (605 reviews vs 17), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Facebook Pages Feed's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Facebook Pages Feed; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Social Media Icons's 605-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Facebook Pages Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Facebook Pages Feed or Social Media Icons cheaper?

Both Facebook Pages Feed and Social Media Icons offer paid plans only. Facebook Pages Feed starts at Free plan available; Social Media Icons starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Facebook Pages Feed or Social Media Icons?

Facebook Pages Feed has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 17 reviews) compared to Social Media Icons (4.5★ from 605 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Facebook Pages Feed or Social Media Icons?

Facebook Pages Feed holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Facebook Pages Feed or Social Media Icons?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Social Media Icons has the deeper published review base (605 vs 17), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Facebook Pages Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). Social Media Icons typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (605 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Facebook Pages Feed and Social Media Icons?

Migration support varies by app and category. Facebook Pages Feed and Social Media Icons both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Facebook Pages Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.