Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Email Marketing | PoCo Omnisend | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Email Marketing | PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 13 | ★ 29 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Email Marketing edges out PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing on rating (4.0★ vs 3.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Email Marketing at Free plan available, PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Email Marketing; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing's 29-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Email Marketing's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Email Marketing audit • PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing audit
| Keyword | Email Marketing | PoCo Omnisend |
|---|---|---|
| email marketing | #1 | #8 |
| email leads | #9 | #8 |
| grow your email | #9 | #8 |
| news tickers | #12 | #7 |
| email sms | #12 | #7 |
Both Email Marketing and PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing offer paid plans only. Email Marketing starts at Free plan available; PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Email Marketing has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 13 reviews) compared to PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing (3.8★ from 29 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Email Marketing fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing has more onboarding documentation maturity (29 reviews vs 13), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Email Marketing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (13 reviews). PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (29 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Email Marketing and PoCo Omnisend Email Marketing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Email Marketing" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
