Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Elfsight WhatsApp Chat | WhatsApp & Chat Buttons | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Elfsight WhatsApp Chat | WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 77 | 31 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Elfsight WhatsApp Chat's 2.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Elfsight WhatsApp Chat at Paid, WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Elfsight WhatsApp Chat's 77-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Elfsight WhatsApp Chat audit • WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz audit
| Keyword | Elfsight WhatsApp Chat | WhatsApp & Chat Buttons |
|---|---|---|
| messenger | #6 | #15 |
| chat whatsapp | #181 | #12 |
| customers via whatsapp | #20 | #12 |
| with whatsapp | #20 | #13 |
| #22 | #14 |
Both Elfsight WhatsApp Chat and WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz offer paid plans only. Elfsight WhatsApp Chat starts at Paid; WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Elfsight WhatsApp Chat (2.7★ from 77 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Elfsight WhatsApp Chat has the deeper published review base (77 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Elfsight WhatsApp Chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (77 reviews). WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Elfsight WhatsApp Chat and WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chatz" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
