Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Elfsight Facebook Chat | Teechats | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Elfsight Facebook Chat | Teechats |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 10 | 3 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 20 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Teechats is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Elfsight Facebook Chat's 1.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Teechats offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Elfsight Facebook Chat starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Teechats ; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Elfsight Facebook Chat's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Teechats 's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Elfsight Facebook Chat audit • Teechats audit
| — |
| Keyword | Elfsight Facebook Chat | Teechats |
|---|---|---|
| messenger | #8 | Not ranked |
| customers | Not ranked | #11 |
| customer | Not ranked | #11 |
| facebook messenger | #15 | Not ranked |
| facebook pixel | #15 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Teechats is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Elfsight Facebook Chat starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Teechats has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Elfsight Facebook Chat (1.8★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Elfsight Facebook Chat fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Teechats is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Elfsight Facebook Chat has more onboarding documentation maturity (10 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Elfsight Facebook Chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (10 reviews). Teechats aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Elfsight Facebook Chat and Teechats both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Teechats " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
