Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| easybill | Peppol e-Invoicing Integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| easybill | Peppol e-Invoicing Integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | easybill | Peppol e-Invoicing Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 2 | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 2 supported | 4 supported |
Based on the data on this page, easybill is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Peppol e-Invoicing Integration's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: easybill at Free plan available, Peppol e-Invoicing Integration at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to easybill; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Peppol e-Invoicing Integration's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than easybill's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: easybill audit • Peppol e-Invoicing Integration audit
| Keyword | easybill | Peppol e-Invoicing Integration |
|---|---|---|
| invoice | #7 | #16 |
| invoices | #7 | #16 |
| voice | #9 | #21 |
| accounting | #23 | #30 |
Both easybill and Peppol e-Invoicing Integration offer paid plans only. easybill starts at Free plan available; Peppol e-Invoicing Integration starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. easybill fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Peppol e-Invoicing Integration is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. easybill has more onboarding documentation maturity (2 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
easybill typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2 reviews). Peppol e-Invoicing Integration aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. easybill and Peppol e-Invoicing Integration both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Peppol e-Invoicing Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.