Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Easy Before/After Slider | Salesdish Images Falling | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Easy Before/After Slider | Salesdish Images Falling |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 58 | ★ 82 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Salesdish Images Falling is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.9★ vs Easy Before/After Slider's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Salesdish Images Falling offers a free tier (Free) while Easy Before/After Slider starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Salesdish Images Falling; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Easy Before/After Slider's 58-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Salesdish Images Falling's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Easy Before/After Slider audit • Salesdish Images Falling audit
| Keyword | Easy Before/After Slider | Salesdish Images Falling |
|---|---|---|
| image fx | #43 | #6 |
| snow effects | #41 | #25 |
| seasonal effects | #42 | #25 |
No tracked changes.
Salesdish Images Falling is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Easy Before/After Slider starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Salesdish Images Falling has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 82 reviews) compared to Easy Before/After Slider (4.2★ from 58 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Easy Before/After Slider fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Salesdish Images Falling is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Salesdish Images Falling has more onboarding documentation maturity (82 reviews vs 58), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Easy Before/After Slider typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (58 reviews). Salesdish Images Falling aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (82 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Easy Before/After Slider and Salesdish Images Falling both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Easy Before/After Slider" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
