Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Canonical Links | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Canonical Links | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 125 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Automatic SEO Tags Fixer is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Canonical Links's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Canonical Links at Free, Automatic SEO Tags Fixer at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the larger user base (125 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Canonical Links's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Automatic SEO Tags Fixer; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Canonical Links's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Automatic SEO Tags Fixer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Canonical Links audit • Automatic SEO Tags Fixer audit
| Keyword | Canonical Links | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer |
|---|---|---|
| optimization | Not ranked | #1 |
| canonical links tags | Not ranked | #1 |
| links tags | Not ranked | #1 |
No tracked changes.
Both Canonical Links and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer offer paid plans only. Canonical Links starts at Free; Automatic SEO Tags Fixer starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Automatic SEO Tags Fixer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the deeper published review base (125 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Canonical Links typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Automatic SEO Tags Fixer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (125 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Canonical Links and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Canonical Links" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
