Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| WhatsApp & Chat Buttons | Doc Viewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty | Doc Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.6k | 43 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty edges out Doc Viewer on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Doc Viewer starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty has the larger user base (1,570 reviews vs 43), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Doc Viewer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Doc Viewer's 43-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty audit • Doc Viewer audit
| Keyword | WhatsApp & Chat Buttons | Doc Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| to call | #30 | #27 |
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Doc Viewer starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1,570 reviews) compared to Doc Viewer (4.7★ from 43 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty has the deeper published review base (1,570 vs 43), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,570 reviews). Doc Viewer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (43 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty and Doc Viewer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Doc Viewer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
