Lumar for SEO vs Google Reviews & SEO Booster

Based on the data on this page, Google Reviews & SEO Booster is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs Lumar for SEO's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Google Reviews & SEO Booster offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Lumar for SEO starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the larger user base (802 reviews vs 17), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lumar for SEO's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Google Reviews & SEO Booster; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lumar for SEO's 17-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google Reviews & SEO Booster's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Lumar for SEO or Google Reviews & SEO Booster cheaper?

Google Reviews & SEO Booster is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Lumar for SEO starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Lumar for SEO or Google Reviews & SEO Booster?

Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 802 reviews) compared to Lumar for SEO (3.2★ from 17 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Lumar for SEO or Google Reviews & SEO Booster?

Google Reviews & SEO Booster holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Lumar for SEO or Google Reviews & SEO Booster?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the deeper published review base (802 vs 17), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Lumar for SEO typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). Google Reviews & SEO Booster typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (802 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Lumar for SEO and Google Reviews & SEO Booster?

Migration support varies by app and category. Lumar for SEO and Google Reviews & SEO Booster both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lumar for SEO" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.