Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Broken & Internal Links Fixer | Lumar for SEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Broken & Internal Links Fixer | Lumar for SEO |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 17 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Broken & Internal Links Fixer is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Lumar for SEO's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Broken & Internal Links Fixer offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Lumar for SEO starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Broken & Internal Links Fixer; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lumar for SEO's 17-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Broken & Internal Links Fixer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Broken & Internal Links Fixer audit • Lumar for SEO audit
| Keyword | Broken & Internal Links Fixer | Lumar for SEO |
|---|---|---|
| issues | #25 | #10 |
| seo optimized | #22 | #241 |
| seo issues | #22 | #241 |
| seo issues automatically | #23 | #241 |
| fix seo issues | #23 | #24 |
Broken & Internal Links Fixer is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Lumar for SEO starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Broken & Internal Links Fixer has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 6 reviews) compared to Lumar for SEO (3.2★ from 17 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Broken & Internal Links Fixer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Lumar for SEO has the deeper published review base (17 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Broken & Internal Links Fixer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). Lumar for SEO typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Broken & Internal Links Fixer and Lumar for SEO both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Broken & Internal Links Fixer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
