Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Bing Webmaster Tools | Lumar for SEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Bing Webmaster Tools | Lumar for SEO |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 17 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Bing Webmaster Tools is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Lumar for SEO's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Bing Webmaster Tools offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Lumar for SEO starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Bing Webmaster Tools; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lumar for SEO's 17-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Bing Webmaster Tools's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Bing Webmaster Tools audit • Lumar for SEO audit
| Keyword | Bing Webmaster Tools | Lumar for SEO |
|---|---|---|
| search | #10 | #13 |
| found | #17 | #9 |
| search results | #18 | #30 |
| search console | #21 | #31 |
| insights | #24 | #38 |
Bing Webmaster Tools is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Lumar for SEO starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Bing Webmaster Tools has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Lumar for SEO (3.2★ from 17 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Bing Webmaster Tools holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Lumar for SEO has the deeper published review base (17 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Bing Webmaster Tools typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Lumar for SEO typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Bing Webmaster Tools and Lumar for SEO both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Bing Webmaster Tools" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
