Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| B2B Dual Price Display | Custom Fees | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | B2B Dual Price Display | Custom Fees |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4 | 3 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
B2B Dual Price Display and Custom Fees are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: B2B Dual Price Display at Paid, Custom Fees at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: B2B Dual Price Display audit • Custom Fees audit
| Keyword | B2B Dual Price Display | Custom Fees |
|---|---|---|
| items fees | Not ranked | #1 |
| customers items fees | Not ranked | #4 |
| rates | #6 | Not ranked |
| easily add | Not ranked | #6 |
| price | #7 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both B2B Dual Price Display and Custom Fees offer paid plans only. B2B Dual Price Display starts at Paid; Custom Fees starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
B2B Dual Price Display (5.0★, 4 reviews) and Custom Fees (5.0★, 3 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. B2B Dual Price Display does carry the larger published review base (4 vs 3). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. B2B Dual Price Display has the deeper published review base (4 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
B2B Dual Price Display typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Custom Fees typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. B2B Dual Price Display and Custom Fees both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Custom Fees" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
