Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
ADA, AODA & WCAG Accessibility Widget 40+ Tools
| Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG | Cursors | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG | Cursors: Create with Effects |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 2.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 47 | 2 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 4 | 3 |
| Languages | 21 supported | 49 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.9★ vs Cursors: Create with Effects's 2.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG at Free plan available, Cursors: Create with Effects at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cursors: Create with Effects's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG audit • Cursors: Create with Effects audit
| Listed | — | — |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG | Cursors |
|---|---|---|
| menu | #17 | #46 |
| menus | #17 | #46 |
Both Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG and Cursors: Create with Effects offer paid plans only. Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG starts at Free plan available; Cursors: Create with Effects starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 47 reviews) compared to Cursors: Create with Effects (2.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Cursors: Create with Effects is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG has more onboarding documentation maturity (47 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (47 reviews). Cursors: Create with Effects aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Accessibility Widget ADA WCAG and Cursors: Create with Effects both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Cursors: Create with Effects" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
