Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| CountDown Pro | Number Counter | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | CountDown Pro | Number Counter |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 153 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 7 supported |
CountDown Pro and Number Counter are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: CountDown Pro at Paid, Number Counter at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Number Counter has the larger user base (153 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CountDown Pro's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CountDown Pro audit • Number Counter audit
| — |
| Keyword | CountDown Pro | Number Counter |
|---|---|---|
| animated | #8 | #31 |
| count up | #41 | #9 |
| count down | #28 | #22 |
| animated cursor | #33 | #40 |
Both CountDown Pro and Number Counter offer paid plans only. CountDown Pro starts at Paid; Number Counter starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
CountDown Pro (5.0★, 1 reviews) and Number Counter (4.9★, 153 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. CountDown Pro fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Number Counter is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Number Counter has more onboarding documentation maturity (153 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
CountDown Pro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). Number Counter aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (153 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CountDown Pro and Number Counter both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CountDown Pro" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
