Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cooltext | Google Fonts | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Cooltext | Google Fonts | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Cooltext | Google Fonts |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.1 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 67 | 3 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 0 supported | 7 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Google Fonts is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Cooltext's 1.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Cooltext offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Google Fonts starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Google Fonts; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cooltext's 67-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google Fonts's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cooltext audit • Google Fonts audit
| Keyword | Cooltext | Google Fonts |
|---|---|---|
| scrolling text | #13 | #44 |
| text | #35 | #42 |
No tracked changes.
Cooltext is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Google Fonts starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Google Fonts has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Cooltext (1.1★ from 67 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Cooltext fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Google Fonts is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Cooltext has more onboarding documentation maturity (67 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Cooltext typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (67 reviews). Google Fonts aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cooltext and Google Fonts both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Fonts" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.