Citations vs Automatic SEO Tags Fixer

Based on the data on this page, Automatic SEO Tags Fixer is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Citations: Boost Site Ranking's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Automatic SEO Tags Fixer offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Citations: Boost Site Ranking starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the larger user base (122 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Citations: Boost Site Ranking's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Automatic SEO Tags Fixer; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Citations: Boost Site Ranking's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Automatic SEO Tags Fixer's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Citations: Boost Site Ranking or Automatic SEO Tags Fixer cheaper?

Automatic SEO Tags Fixer is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Citations: Boost Site Ranking starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Citations: Boost Site Ranking or Automatic SEO Tags Fixer?

Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 122 reviews) compared to Citations: Boost Site Ranking (3.2★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Citations: Boost Site Ranking or Automatic SEO Tags Fixer?

Automatic SEO Tags Fixer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Citations: Boost Site Ranking or Automatic SEO Tags Fixer?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the deeper published review base (122 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Citations: Boost Site Ranking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Automatic SEO Tags Fixer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (122 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.