Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT | Citations: Boost Site Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 3 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 4 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 49 supported |
Based on the data on this page, SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Citations: Boost Site Ranking's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT at Paid, Citations: Boost Site Ranking at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Citations: Boost Site Ranking's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT audit • Citations: Boost Site Ranking audit
| Keyword | SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| site into | #25 | #11 |
| site search | #26 | #13 |
| your site | #31 | #12 |
| turn your site | #31 | #12 |
| site | #36 | #12 |
Both SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT and Citations: Boost Site Ranking offer paid plans only. SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT starts at Paid; Citations: Boost Site Ranking starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Citations: Boost Site Ranking (3.2★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Citations: Boost Site Ranking has the deeper published review base (3 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Citations: Boost Site Ranking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT and Citations: Boost Site Ranking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SEO Audit & AI Fix by ChatGPT" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
