Loading content…
| Metric | Chat: GPT based conversations | LinkedIn Button: Ichonic |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 32 | 12 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 49 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, LinkedIn Button: Ichonic is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Chat: GPT based conversations's 3.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Chat: GPT based conversations offers a free tier (Free plan available) while LinkedIn Button: Ichonic starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to LinkedIn Button: Ichonic; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Chat: GPT based conversations's 32-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LinkedIn Button: Ichonic's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Chat: GPT based conversations audit • LinkedIn Button: Ichonic audit
| Keyword | Chat | LinkedIn Button |
|---|---|---|
| chat | #33 | #35 |
| chat buttons | #45 | #43 |
| chat button | #46 | #45 |
| whatsapp chat button | #47 | #46 |
Chat: GPT based conversations is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). LinkedIn Button: Ichonic starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
LinkedIn Button: Ichonic has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 12 reviews) compared to Chat: GPT based conversations (3.5★ from 32 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
LinkedIn Button: Ichonic holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Chat: GPT based conversations has the deeper published review base (32 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Chat: GPT based conversations typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). LinkedIn Button: Ichonic typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chat: GPT based conversations and LinkedIn Button: Ichonic both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LinkedIn Button: Ichonic" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
