Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Size Chart | Common Ninja Charts & Graphs | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Create Stunning, Interactive Charts & Graphs for
| Metric | Size Chart | Common Ninja Charts & Graphs |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 3.8 ★ | 2.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 31 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Size Chart is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 3.8★ vs Common Ninja Charts & Graphs's 2.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Common Ninja Charts & Graphs offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Size Chart starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Size Chart; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Common Ninja Charts & Graphs's 31-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Size Chart's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Size Chart audit • Common Ninja Charts & Graphs audit
| Keyword | Size Chart | Common Ninja Charts & Graphs |
|---|---|---|
| chart | #4 | #2 |
| charts | #4 | #2 |
| interactive charts | #6 | #1 |
| charts graphs | #6 | #1 |
| chart size guides | #6 | #2 |
Common Ninja Charts & Graphs is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Size Chart starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Size Chart has the higher average rating (3.8★ from 4 reviews) compared to Common Ninja Charts & Graphs (2.8★ from 31 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Size Chart fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Common Ninja Charts & Graphs is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Common Ninja Charts & Graphs has more onboarding documentation maturity (31 reviews vs 4), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Size Chart typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4 reviews). Common Ninja Charts & Graphs aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (31 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Size Chart and Common Ninja Charts & Graphs both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Size Chart" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
