Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Bulk SEO Meta Editor | Google Reviews & SEO Booster | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Bulk SEO Meta Editor | Google Reviews & SEO Booster |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 802 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Google Reviews & SEO Booster is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs Bulk SEO Meta Editor's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Google Reviews & SEO Booster offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Bulk SEO Meta Editor starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the larger user base (802 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Bulk SEO Meta Editor's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Google Reviews & SEO Booster; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Bulk SEO Meta Editor's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google Reviews & SEO Booster's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Bulk SEO Meta Editor audit • Google Reviews & SEO Booster audit
| Keyword | Bulk SEO Meta Editor | Google Reviews & SEO Booster |
|---|---|---|
| fix seo | #38 | #2 |
| seo audits | #38 | #4 |
| seo issues automatically | #42 | #2 |
| seo issues | #42 | #2 |
| seo optimized | #42 | #2 |
Google Reviews & SEO Booster is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Bulk SEO Meta Editor starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Google Reviews & SEO Booster holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the deeper published review base (802 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Bulk SEO Meta Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Google Reviews & SEO Booster typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (802 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Bulk SEO Meta Editor and Google Reviews & SEO Booster both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Bulk SEO Meta Editor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
