Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Bulk SEO Meta Editor | Bing Webmaster Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Bulk SEO Meta Editor | Bing Webmaster Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 8 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Bing Webmaster Tools is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Bulk SEO Meta Editor's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Bing Webmaster Tools offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Bulk SEO Meta Editor starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Bing Webmaster Tools; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Bulk SEO Meta Editor's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Bing Webmaster Tools's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Bulk SEO Meta Editor audit • Bing Webmaster Tools audit
| Keyword | Bulk SEO Meta Editor | Bing Webmaster Tools |
|---|---|---|
| titles | #3 | Not ranked |
| clock | #14 | Not ranked |
| automated ai bulk | #16 | Not ranked |
Bing Webmaster Tools is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Bulk SEO Meta Editor starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Bing Webmaster Tools holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Bing Webmaster Tools has the deeper published review base (8 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Bulk SEO Meta Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Bing Webmaster Tools typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Bulk SEO Meta Editor and Bing Webmaster Tools both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Bulk SEO Meta Editor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
