Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery | Delivery | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery | Delivery |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 224 | 6 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
Delivery edges out Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Delivery offers a free tier (Free) while Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery has the larger user base (224 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Delivery's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Delivery; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery's 224-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Delivery's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery audit • Delivery audit
| — |
| Keyword | Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery | Delivery |
|---|---|---|
| delivery | Not ranked | #1 |
| date | Not ranked | #2 |
| recover | #3 | Not ranked |
| delivery issues | Not ranked | #3 |
| emails | #13 | Not ranked |
Delivery is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Delivery has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 6 reviews) compared to Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery (4.7★ from 224 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Delivery holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery has the deeper published review base (224 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (224 reviews). Delivery typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Carti Abandoned Cart Recovery and Delivery both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Delivery" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
