Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| BL Before and After Comparison | Photo Editor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | BL Before and After Comparison | Photo Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 160 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Photo Editor is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.7★ vs BL Before and After Comparison's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Photo Editor offers a free tier (Free plan available) while BL Before and After Comparison starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Photo Editor has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. BL Before and After Comparison's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Photo Editor; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — BL Before and After Comparison's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Photo Editor's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BL Before and After Comparison audit • Photo Editor audit
| Keyword | BL Before and After Comparison | Photo Editor |
|---|---|---|
| image comparison | #47 | #35 |
Photo Editor is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). BL Before and After Comparison starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. BL Before and After Comparison fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Photo Editor is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Photo Editor has more onboarding documentation maturity (160 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
BL Before and After Comparison typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Photo Editor aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (160 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BL Before and After Comparison and Photo Editor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BL Before and After Comparison" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
