Loading content…
Birthday Club vs stack.promo
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Birthday Club | stack.promo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Birthday Club | stack.promo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Birthday Club | stack.promo |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 1.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 65 | 1 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 4 | 3 |
| Languages | 7 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Birthday Club is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.5★ vs stack.promo's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Birthday Club offers a free tier (Free plan available) while stack.promo starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Birthday Club; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — stack.promo's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Birthday Club's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Birthday Club audit • stack.promo audit
| — |
| Keyword | Birthday Club | stack.promo |
|---|---|---|
| reward | #1 | #7 |
| loyalty | #3 | #10 |
| loyalty program | #8 | #13 |
Birthday Club is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). stack.promo starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Birthday Club has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 65 reviews) compared to stack.promo (1.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Birthday Club fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; stack.promo is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Birthday Club has more onboarding documentation maturity (65 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Birthday Club typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (65 reviews). stack.promo aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Birthday Club and stack.promo both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from stack.promo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.