Loading content…
PODpartner vs BeautyBoss
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| BeautyBoss | PODpartner | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| BeautyBoss | PODpartner | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | BeautyBoss | PODpartner: Print on Demand |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 9 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, PODpartner: Print on Demand is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 3.0★ vs BeautyBoss's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: BeautyBoss at Paid, PODpartner: Print on Demand at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to PODpartner: Print on Demand; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — BeautyBoss's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PODpartner: Print on Demand's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BeautyBoss audit • PODpartner: Print on Demand audit
| Keyword | BeautyBoss | PODpartner |
|---|---|---|
| #16 | #23 | |
| own print | #38 | #6 |
| demand | #34 | #14 |
No tracked changes.
Both BeautyBoss and PODpartner: Print on Demand offer paid plans only. BeautyBoss starts at Paid; PODpartner: Print on Demand starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PODpartner: Print on Demand holds the higher average rating (3.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. PODpartner: Print on Demand has the deeper published review base (9 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BeautyBoss typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). PODpartner: Print on Demand typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BeautyBoss and PODpartner: Print on Demand both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BeautyBoss" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.