| Metric | Back to Top Button | Impressive Site Menu |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 10 | ★ 1.1k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | — | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 8 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Back to Top Button is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.8★ vs Impressive Site Menu's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Back to Top Button at Free, Impressive Site Menu at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Impressive Site Menu has the larger user base (1,072 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Back to Top Button's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Back to Top Button; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Impressive Site Menu's 1,072-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Back to Top Button's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Back to Top Button audit • Impressive Site Menu audit
| — |
| Keyword | Back to Top Button | Impressive Site Menu |
|---|---|---|
| menus | #39 | #2 |
| menu | #39 | #2 |
| restaurant menu | #42 | #2 |
| menu management | #47 | #1 |
| products to | #5 | #48 |
No tracked changes.
Both Back to Top Button and Impressive Site Menu offer paid plans only. Back to Top Button starts at Free; Impressive Site Menu starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Back to Top Button has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 10 reviews) compared to Impressive Site Menu (4.0★ from 1,072 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Back to Top Button holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Impressive Site Menu has the deeper published review base (1,072 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Back to Top Button typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). Impressive Site Menu typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,072 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Back to Top Button and Impressive Site Menu both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Back to Top Button" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.