Loading content…
Back to Top vs Cursor Lab
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Back to Top | Cursor Lab | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Back to Top | Cursor Lab | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Back to Top | Cursor Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 13 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Cursor Lab is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Back to Top's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Cursor Lab offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Back to Top starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Cursor Lab; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Back to Top's 13-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cursor Lab's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Back to Top audit • Cursor Lab audit
| — |
| Keyword | Back to Top | Cursor Lab |
|---|---|---|
| menu | #34 | #36 |
| menus | #34 | #36 |
| menu management | #44 | #47 |
Cursor Lab is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Back to Top starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Cursor Lab has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Back to Top (4.5★ from 13 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Back to Top fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Cursor Lab is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Back to Top has more onboarding documentation maturity (13 reviews vs 4), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Back to Top typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (13 reviews). Cursor Lab aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Back to Top and Cursor Lab both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Cursor Lab" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.