Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| autoSchema | Google SEO Schema | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | autoSchema | Google SEO Schema | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 122 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
autoSchema | Google SEO Schema and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Automatic SEO Tags Fixer offers a free tier (Free plan available) while autoSchema | Google SEO Schema starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the larger user base (122 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. autoSchema | Google SEO Schema's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: autoSchema | Google SEO Schema audit • Automatic SEO Tags Fixer audit
| Keyword | autoSchema | Google SEO Schema | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer |
|---|---|---|
| seo issues automatically | #28 | #5 |
| fix seo | #29 | #5 |
| automatic | #27 | #7 |
| seo audits | #28 | #7 |
| seo issues | #31 | #5 |
Automatic SEO Tags Fixer is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). autoSchema | Google SEO Schema starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
autoSchema | Google SEO Schema (5.0★, 3 reviews) and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer (5.0★, 122 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. Automatic SEO Tags Fixer does carry the larger published review base (122 vs 3). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the deeper published review base (122 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
autoSchema | Google SEO Schema typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Automatic SEO Tags Fixer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (122 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. autoSchema | Google SEO Schema and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from autoSchema | Google SEO Schema" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
