Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Auto Savings for Plans Holders | Spin Wheel Game | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | Auto Savings for Plans Holders | Spin Wheel Game |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.0 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 26 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 49 supported | 6 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Spin Wheel Game is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.7★ vs Auto Savings for Plans Holders's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Auto Savings for Plans Holders offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Spin Wheel Game starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Spin Wheel Game; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Auto Savings for Plans Holders's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Spin Wheel Game's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Auto Savings for Plans Holders audit • Spin Wheel Game audit
| Listed | — | — |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Auto Savings for Plans Holders | Spin Wheel Game |
|---|---|---|
| discount | #18 | #5 |
| discounts | #18 | #5 |
| loyalty | #25 | #16 |
| volume discounts | #24 | #17 |
| coupon | #18 | #32 |
Auto Savings for Plans Holders is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Spin Wheel Game starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Spin Wheel Game has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 26 reviews) compared to Auto Savings for Plans Holders (1.0★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Auto Savings for Plans Holders fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Spin Wheel Game is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Spin Wheel Game has more onboarding documentation maturity (26 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Auto Savings for Plans Holders typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). Spin Wheel Game aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (26 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Auto Savings for Plans Holders and Spin Wheel Game both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Auto Savings for Plans Holders" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
