Loading content…
Audio Player vs Spotify
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Audio Player | Spotify | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Audio Player | Spotify | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Audio Player | Spotify |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 31 | 14 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 7 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Audio Player is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Spotify 's 3.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Audio Player at Paid, Spotify at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Audio Player; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Spotify 's 14-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Audio Player's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Audio Player audit • Spotify audit
| — |
| Keyword | Audio Player | Spotify |
|---|---|---|
| mood | #4 | Not ranked |
| preview | Not ranked | #9 |
| minutes | #13 | Not ranked |
| instantly | Not ranked | #18 |
| customizable | #30 | Not ranked |
Both Audio Player and Spotify offer paid plans only. Audio Player starts at Paid; Spotify starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Audio Player has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Spotify (3.5★ from 14 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Audio Player fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Spotify is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Audio Player has more onboarding documentation maturity (31 reviews vs 14), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Audio Player typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (31 reviews). Spotify aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (14 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Audio Player and Spotify both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Spotify " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.