Audio Player vs Fera Reviews

Audio Player edges out Fera Reviews on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

On pricing, Fera Reviews offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Audio Player starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Fera Reviews has the larger user base (4,038 reviews vs 37), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Audio Player's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Audio Player; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fera Reviews's 4,038-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Audio Player's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Audio Player or Fera Reviews cheaper?

Fera Reviews is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Audio Player starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Audio Player or Fera Reviews?

Audio Player has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 37 reviews) compared to Fera Reviews (4.8★ from 4,038 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Audio Player or Fera Reviews?

Audio Player holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Audio Player or Fera Reviews?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Fera Reviews has the deeper published review base (4,038 vs 37), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Audio Player typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (37 reviews). Fera Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,038 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Audio Player and Fera Reviews?

Migration support varies by app and category. Audio Player and Fera Reviews both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Audio Player" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.