Loading content…
Attributer vs SEO Audit
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Attributer | SEO Audit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Attributer | SEO Audit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Attributer | SEO Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, SEO Audit is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Attributer's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, SEO Audit offers a free tier (Free) while Attributer starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to SEO Audit; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Attributer's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than SEO Audit's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Attributer audit • SEO Audit audit
| Keyword | Attributer | SEO Audit |
|---|---|---|
| seo audits | Not ranked | #1 |
| capture utm parameters | #7 | Not ranked |
| website | Not ranked | #8 |
| audits | Not ranked | #9 |
| submission | #20 | Not ranked |
SEO Audit is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Attributer starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
SEO Audit holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. SEO Audit has the deeper published review base (1 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Attributer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). SEO Audit typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Attributer and SEO Audit both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Attributer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.