Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix | Back To Top Buttons | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix | Back To Top Buttons |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 81 | 1 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 21 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs Back To Top Buttons's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Back To Top Buttons starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Back To Top Buttons's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix audit • Back To Top Buttons audit
| — |
| Keyword | Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix | Back To Top Buttons |
|---|---|---|
| suggestions to fix | #1 | #17 |
| widget with ada | #1 | Not ranked |
| accessibility widget | #2 | Not ranked |
| back | Not ranked | #5 |
| scroll | Not ranked | #14 |
Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Back To Top Buttons starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 81 reviews) compared to Back To Top Buttons (4.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix has the deeper published review base (81 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (81 reviews). Back To Top Buttons typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Accessibility Widget+Audit+Fix and Back To Top Buttons both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Back To Top Buttons" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
