Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Instagram Feed Pro | Instafeed + Stories | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Instagram Feed Pro | Instafeed + Stories |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 340 | 103 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
Instagram Feed Pro edges out Instafeed + Stories on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Instagram Feed Pro offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Instafeed + Stories starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Instagram Feed Pro has the larger user base (340 reviews vs 103), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Instafeed + Stories's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Instagram Feed Pro; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Instafeed + Stories's 103-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Instagram Feed Pro's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Instagram Feed Pro audit • Instafeed + Stories audit
| — |
| Keyword | Instagram Feed Pro | Instafeed + Stories |
|---|---|---|
| feeds | #5 | #9 |
| feed | #5 | #9 |
| #8 | #12 | |
| items fees | #4 | #19 |
| social | #9 | #15 |
Instagram Feed Pro is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Instafeed + Stories starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Instagram Feed Pro has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 340 reviews) compared to Instafeed + Stories (4.8★ from 103 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Instagram Feed Pro holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Instagram Feed Pro has the deeper published review base (340 vs 103), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Instagram Feed Pro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (340 reviews). Instafeed + Stories typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (103 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Instagram Feed Pro and Instafeed + Stories both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Instafeed + Stories" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
