Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Square Integration | Amaspace 3D Customizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Square Integration | Amaspace 3D Customizer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 11 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 7 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Square Integration is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Amaspace 3D Customizer's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Square Integration at Paid, Amaspace 3D Customizer at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Square Integration; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Amaspace 3D Customizer's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Square Integration's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Square Integration audit • Amaspace 3D Customizer audit
| — |
| Keyword | Square Integration | Amaspace 3D Customizer |
|---|---|---|
| import | #4 | Not ranked |
| stripe square | #4 | Not ranked |
| sync | #5 | Not ranked |
| customize | Not ranked | #10 |
| customize stunning | Not ranked | #10 |
Both Square Integration and Amaspace 3D Customizer offer paid plans only. Square Integration starts at Paid; Amaspace 3D Customizer starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Square Integration holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Square Integration has the deeper published review base (11 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Square Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). Amaspace 3D Customizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Square Integration and Amaspace 3D Customizer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Amaspace 3D Customizer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
