Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| autoSchema | Google SEO Schema | SEO with AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | autoSchema | Google SEO Schema | SEO with AI: Optimize Faster |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 19 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 49 supported |
Based on the data on this page, autoSchema | Google SEO Schema is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs SEO with AI: Optimize Faster's 3.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, SEO with AI: Optimize Faster offers a free tier (Free plan available) while autoSchema | Google SEO Schema starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to autoSchema | Google SEO Schema; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — SEO with AI: Optimize Faster's 19-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than autoSchema | Google SEO Schema's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: autoSchema | Google SEO Schema audit • SEO with AI: Optimize Faster audit
| — |
| Keyword | autoSchema | Google SEO Schema | SEO with AI |
|---|---|---|
| faster | Not ranked | #3 |
| experience with | Not ranked | #6 |
| data with | Not ranked | #7 |
SEO with AI: Optimize Faster is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). autoSchema | Google SEO Schema starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
autoSchema | Google SEO Schema has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to SEO with AI: Optimize Faster (3.5★ from 19 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
autoSchema | Google SEO Schema holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. SEO with AI: Optimize Faster has the deeper published review base (19 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
autoSchema | Google SEO Schema typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). SEO with AI: Optimize Faster typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (19 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. autoSchema | Google SEO Schema and SEO with AI: Optimize Faster both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from autoSchema | Google SEO Schema" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
