Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Easy A/B testing with no code. Schedule changes to see which AB test boosts conversion rates.
| Theme Scientist A/B Testing | Parkour | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Theme Scientist A/B Testing | Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 13 | ★ 191 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2020 | Oct 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs Theme Scientist A/B Testing's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Theme Scientist A/B Testing at Free trial available, Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the larger user base (191 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Theme Scientist A/B Testing's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Theme Scientist A/B Testing's 13-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Theme Scientist A/B Testing audit • Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed audit
| Keyword | Theme Scientist A/B Testing | Parkour |
|---|---|---|
| conversion api | Not ranked | #1 |
| meta pixel | Not ranked | #1 |
| pixels | Not ranked | #1 |
| audit test kw | #74 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Theme Scientist A/B Testing and Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed offer paid plans only. Theme Scientist A/B Testing starts at Free trial available; Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 191 reviews) compared to Theme Scientist A/B Testing (4.0★ from 13 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the deeper published review base (191 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Theme Scientist A/B Testing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (191 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Theme Scientist A/B Testing and Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Theme Scientist A/B Testing" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
