Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| PageFly Landing Page Builder | TR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | PageFly Landing Page Builder | TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.6k | 33 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 7 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 27 new | — |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2017 | Sep 2018 |
PageFly Landing Page Builder edges out TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,608 reviews vs 33), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PageFly Landing Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers's 33-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PageFly Landing Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PageFly Landing Page Builder audit • TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PageFly Landing Page Builder | TR |
|---|---|---|
| page | #1 | Not ranked |
| landing pages | #2 | Not ranked |
| landing page builder | #3 | Not ranked |
| customer service automation | Not ranked | #188 |
| customer support automation | Not ranked | #189 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | PageFly Landing Page Builder | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) | 4.8 ★ (33) |
| Rating distribution | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +6 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +27 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +111 | — |
Both PageFly Landing Page Builder and TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers offer paid plans only. PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly Landing Page Builder has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 5,608 reviews) compared to TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers (4.8★ from 33 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. PageFly Landing Page Builder fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,608 reviews vs 33), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
PageFly Landing Page Builder typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (5,608 reviews). TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (33 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
You guys always figure it out! Thanks so much!
the app is a little clunky but the live chat assistance is invaluable. thank you Dan!
Mahedi, was so helpful. I have been having some difficulty with figuring out how to navigate the app and he came in and assisted me with figuring out how to answer my inquiry and with his help I was able to successfully figure out the problem and fix it.
LP作りや商品ページ作りを比較的簡単に行うことのできる最適なツールだと思います。サポートも迅速で親切でした。ご対応、感謝いたします。
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. PageFly Landing Page Builder and TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from TR: Auto Tag Orders, Customers" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
