Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
AI page builder for home, product, collection, landing, about and contact pages. No code.
| PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder | RT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder | RT: Smooth Scroll To Top |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.9k | 23 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 4 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 50 new | — |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2017 | Feb 2021 |
PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder and RT: Smooth Scroll To Top are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder at Free plan available, RT: Smooth Scroll To Top at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder has the larger user base (5,897 reviews vs 23), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. RT: Smooth Scroll To Top's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder audit • RT: Smooth Scroll To Top audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder | RT |
|---|---|---|
| page | #2 | Not ranked |
| landing | #3 | Not ranked |
| landing page builder | #3 | Not ranked |
| top button | Not ranked | #17 |
| scroll to | Not ranked | #23 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder | RT |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (5.9k) | 4.9 ★ (23) |
| Rating distribution | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +11 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +50 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +127 | — |
Both PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder and RT: Smooth Scroll To Top offer paid plans only. PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder starts at Free plan available; RT: Smooth Scroll To Top starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder (4.9★, 5,897 reviews) and RT: Smooth Scroll To Top (4.9★, 23 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.9★. PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder does carry the larger published review base (5,897 vs 23). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder has the deeper published review base (5,897 vs 23), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (5,897 reviews). RT: Smooth Scroll To Top typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (23 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
The app is good. I had a problem with some of my products not loading correctly and Eli was incredibly kind and helpful. He solved the problem quickly and was very efficient. I can only hope if I have another snafu that I'll be connected with him again because he was VERY helpful!!! Thanks Eli!
I have only good things to say about the PageFly app and its team, if I have any issues, I simply reach out via chat and they come back to me within a minute or two. They offer some very good advice and tips and helped a non techie like me to get my site up and running and looking and very nice too (solapup.com). I hig
I deleted the app after wasting two hours trying to build one page. Support was slow, gave incomplete instructions, and took 5–10 minutes to answer simple questions. Setting up even a basic announcement bar became unnecessarily difficult. I do not recommend this app unless you have an entire week to design one page.
Simply brilliant! PageFly has far exceeded my expectations. Finally, you can create your dream online store completely on your own, with total freedom and flexibility, without being tied down by the rigid and restrictive constraints of a traditional theme. The endless possibilities for layout and design allow you to br
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder and RT: Smooth Scroll To Top both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from RT: Smooth Scroll To Top" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
