Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Our Fakturoid implementation will help you automate your accounting and invoicing within the EU.
| Fakturoid • Integration | 電子發票 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
| Metric | Fakturoid • Integration | 電子發票 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 50 | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | 提供免費試用 |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 2 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2017 | May 2026 |
Based on the data on this page, Fakturoid • Integration is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs 電子發票's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Fakturoid • Integration offers a free tier (Free plan available) while 電子發票 starts at 提供免費試用. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Fakturoid • Integration; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — 電子發票's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Fakturoid • Integration's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fakturoid • Integration audit • 電子發票 audit
| — |
| Keyword | Fakturoid • Integration | 電子發票 |
|---|---|---|
| monday.com integration | #12 | Not ranked |
| wordpress blog integration | #12 | Not ranked |
| invoice integration services | #21 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Fakturoid • Integration is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). 電子發票 starts at 提供免費試用. Both publish their pricing on the Shopify App Store; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Fakturoid • Integration does carry the larger published review base (50 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Fakturoid • Integration has the deeper published review base (50 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fakturoid • Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (50 reviews). 電子發票 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fakturoid • Integration and 電子發票 both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from 電子發票" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
