Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Ensure your store complies with accessibility laws, especially in Germany, the United States, EU,etc
| Avada Accessibility Widget ADA | Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Elevate your Checkout experience with personalized consent fields tailored to your business needs.
| Metric | Avada Accessibility Widget ADA | Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 298 | 1 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Languages | 6 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2025 | Feb 2024 |
Avada Accessibility Widget ADA and Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Avada Accessibility Widget ADA at Free plan available, Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Avada Accessibility Widget ADA has the larger user base (298 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada Accessibility Widget ADA audit • Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Avada Accessibility Widget ADA | Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields |
|---|---|---|
| accessibility | #1 | Not ranked |
| accessibility widget | #1 | Not ranked |
| ada compliance | #1 | Not ranked |
| customer support tool | Not ranked | #227 |
| customer service ai | Not ranked | #227 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both Avada Accessibility Widget ADA and Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields offer paid plans only. Avada Accessibility Widget ADA starts at Free plan available; Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada Accessibility Widget ADA (5.0★, 298 reviews) and Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Avada Accessibility Widget ADA fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Avada Accessibility Widget ADA has more onboarding documentation maturity (298 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Avada Accessibility Widget ADA typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (298 reviews). Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada Accessibility Widget ADA and Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Tusk ‑ Custom Checkout Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
