Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Ensure your store complies with accessibility laws, especially in Germany, the United States, EU,etc
| Avada Accessibility ADA EAA | RT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA | RT: Terms and Conditions Box |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 314 | ★ 382 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Featured placements | 2 | 2 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2025 | Sep 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada Accessibility ADA EAA is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs RT: Terms and Conditions Box's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Avada Accessibility ADA EAA at Free plan available, RT: Terms and Conditions Box at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
RT: Terms and Conditions Box has the larger user base (382 reviews vs 314), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Avada Accessibility ADA EAA's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada Accessibility ADA EAA; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — RT: Terms and Conditions Box's 382-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada Accessibility ADA EAA's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada Accessibility ADA EAA audit • RT: Terms and Conditions Box audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA | RT |
|---|---|---|
| checkbox | #18 | #5 |
Both Avada Accessibility ADA EAA and RT: Terms and Conditions Box offer paid plans only. Avada Accessibility ADA EAA starts at Free plan available; RT: Terms and Conditions Box starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada Accessibility ADA EAA has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 314 reviews) compared to RT: Terms and Conditions Box (4.5★ from 382 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Avada Accessibility ADA EAA holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. RT: Terms and Conditions Box has the deeper published review base (382 vs 314), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Avada Accessibility ADA EAA typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (314 reviews). RT: Terms and Conditions Box typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (382 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada Accessibility ADA EAA and RT: Terms and Conditions Box both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Avada Accessibility ADA EAA" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
