Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| PageFly Landing Page Builder | Apps Mav | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | PageFly Landing Page Builder | Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 2.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.6k | 8 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 7 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 27 new | — |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2017 | Oct 2016 |
Based on the data on this page, PageFly Landing Page Builder is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN!'s 2.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,624 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN!'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PageFly Landing Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN!'s 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PageFly Landing Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PageFly Landing Page Builder audit • Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PageFly Landing Page Builder | Apps Mav |
|---|---|---|
| page | #1 | Not ranked |
| landing pages | #2 | Not ranked |
| landing | #3 | Not ranked |
| giveaways and | Not ranked | #24 |
| giveaways | Not ranked | #24 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | PageFly Landing Page Builder | Apps Mav |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) | 2.9 ★ (8) |
| Rating distribution | 594% 42% 31% 21% 13% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +5 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +27 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +112 | — |
Both PageFly Landing Page Builder and Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! offer paid plans only. PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly Landing Page Builder has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 5,624 reviews) compared to Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! (2.9★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. PageFly Landing Page Builder fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,624 reviews vs 8), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
PageFly Landing Page Builder typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (5,624 reviews). Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (8 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Mahedi, was so helpful. I have been having some difficulty with figuring out how to navigate the app and he came in and assisted me with figuring out how to answer my inquiry and with his help I was able to successfully figure out the problem and fix it.
LP作りや商品ページ作りを比較的簡単に行うことのできる最適なツールだと思います。サポートも迅速で親切でした。ご対応、感謝いたします。
The platform is very user-friendly, and the team is exceptionally helpful and responsive, resolving any issues promptly.
Great app, and great support team. I had a great experience with Marcel who helped me fix a few issues I had with my landing page. Very responsive team.
PageFly is a very useful page builder app. I had a language redirect issue on my store, and their support team helped me patiently and successfully fixed the problem. The response was professional, fast, and very helpful. I really appreciate their support, and I will continue using PageFly. Highly recommended!
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. PageFly Landing Page Builder and Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN! both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Apps Mav: Scratch and WIN!" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
