Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
ノーコードで商品・コレクション・ページにアクセス制限をかけられるロックアプリです。 パスワード保護・タグベース・ログイン必須の3つの方式で、限定公開や会員制ストアを手軽に実現できます。
| RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 | miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
Allow users to Single Sign-On (SSO) into the store with any IdP for B2C/B2B stores
| Metric | RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 | miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 58 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free trial available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 2 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2026 | Oct 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 at Free plan available, miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 audit • miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO audit
| — |
Both RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 and miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO offer paid plans only. RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 starts at Free plan available; miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO has more onboarding documentation maturity (58 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (58 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限 and miniOrange Single Sign On‑SSO both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from RYX Gate｜かんたんページロック・アクセス制限" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
